Societal Racism

In the United States, ever since the day’s of slavery there has been a racial tension amongst blacks and whites and now Hispanics as well. In the USA the white privilege feeling had been fading up until fairly recently where it seems like in the Southern United States the white on black violence seems to be ending in deaths that were preventable, as in the case of Trayvon Martin. Martin was an innocent African-American teenager who was shot by a white male who was a block security guard (unpaid) who thought Martin was brandishing a weapon when it was really a bag of candy and a can of pop. George Zimmerman, the shooter, is now in court on second-degree murder charges and has not yet put in a plea. If Zimmerman has any integrity what-so-ever he will put in a guilty plea and avoid the racial fury that will come from the African-American population. In this case it has a lot of similarities in terms of the anger the African-American population feels towards a white man as it did in the case of Rodney King. The riots, the racial tensions and pleads for “getting along” need to be avoided at all costs and the American justice system must quash this societal racism where the color of your skin dictates whether you are viewed as a criminal or not. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED to avoid chaos.

http://www.theprovince.com/news/Trayvon+Martin+shooter+George+Zimmerman+appears+court+remains+jail+with/6448147/story.html 

Racism

In this story two white men shot at 5 black people killing three of them and wounding two. The area in which the shooters opened fire was a predominantly black area in Tulsa, USA. Racism has been a major issue in the United States ever since the days of slavery and is still present in the Southern United States where tensions seem to be boiling after the shooting of Trayvon Martin and now the killing of innocent African-Americans by Alvin Watts and Jake England. England’s father was slain by a black man and he wrote on his facebook wall that he was “gone in the head” and he clearly believed that he was not going to treat blacks with respect anymore and as an inferior race that he needed to exact revenge on. Gun violence, racial violence, and racial tensions in the United States between whites killing blacks seems to enforce the definition of racism as it seems like the whites hold a set of attitudes, beliefs, and practices to justify the superior treatment of their own and inferior treatment of blacks.

http://www.theprovince.com/news/arrested+Oklahoma+shootings+that+killed+wounded/6427852/story.html

Mean-World Syndrome

Syria violence kills over 100 ahead of ceasefire deadlineRead more: http://www.theprovince.com/news/Syria+violence+kills+over+ahead+ceasefire+deadline/6425332/story.html#ixzz1rNjlPW6U

It almost seems as if every time the Middle-East makes the news in a western society the only thing that the headlines will tell you is a death toll. I understand that war and revolution and change is in the air and violence is present and people are dying but I feel as if I don’t know the issues, the successes and failures, or the general feeling amongst the people who are living there. In Kwantlen, I believe you would be hard pressed to find out who is winning the war in Syria, or Egypt or many of the other countries in that region because we are only shown the sensationalized headlines of death tolls and bombings. I have a personal connection to Syria because a good friend of mine has gone back to Syria to visit his newly wed bride and to make sure she is safe from any danger. I believe once he is back I will be much better informed about this situation than what the newspapers are feeding the Western society with statistics and numbers that are seemingly irrelevant if we do not know who is winning the war and who is fighting for which causes. The lack of knowledge by the West may be due to our desensitization to war issues in the region but I believe in part it is because the media is failing to educate us but rather show us violence and fighting and war to sell their papers.

Everyday Racism

In this case of everyday racism a high-profile African-American writer, producer and actor, Tyler Perry was racially profiled as a deviant in a case of everyday racism in Florida. Mr. Perry was following safety precautions set out by his security team in an event that someone may follow him and he admitted to taking an illegal turn which was caught by police. The police had “seemingly benign ideas about the relative superiority of their group both as white privileged males as well as recognizing his possible inferiority as being an African American male who had just done something he shouldn’t have. The position of power also related to their superior feeling above him and influenced their decision to question Mr. Perry in a tense manner and with a relatively disrespectful tone. The scene could have turned much worse until a black police officer came and recognized the situation. This is just one case where someone famous with the power the draw attention this issue is able to speak about it on a national level. The thousands of young black males who face this daily in the USA who have no voice in the mass media are living through everyday racism literally everyday. This case has drawn national attention after the murder of Trayvon Martin a young black male shot to death by a local block security official while holding a pop can and some candy that was mistaken for a gun.

http://www.theprovince.com/news/Police+probe+Tyler+Perry+racial+profiling+charge/6425297/story.html

Genocide

In 1984 “The World’s Biggest Democracy” (self-proclaimed), India, launched a full scale genocide against the Sikh people. The Indian government set up agencies to perform ethnic cleansing of the Sikh people in both the capital city of New Delhi as well as attempting to enter into the state of Punjab and attack the holiest Sikh shrine the Harminder Sahib. The goal of Indira Ghandi at the time was to cleanse India of Sikhs and the state of Punjab to fall from being such a prosperous and strong state with rumblings of separatism into their own state called Khalistan, named after the Khalsa, which is a follower of the Sikh religion. The Hindu government supported full blown attacks on Sikh temples, their businesses, and their homes all while forcing a media blackout around the world and labelled Sikh’s as radicals and rebels. The genocide committed by Indira Ghandi only differs from that committed by Adolf Hitler in that the world did not hear the Sikh’s side of the story and for the most part the world went along with their business due to a media blackout and propaganda tactics employed by Indira Ghandi. “The World’s Biggest Democracy” is actually the world’s biggest hypocrisy because at least in the case of the German’s in charge they faced their punishment whereas in India the people in charge of committing massive war crimes are now sitting pretty in positions of power in the congress.

http://www.sikhgenocide.org/background.htm

ethocentrism

In this article the Canadian government and their ethnocentric “Us vs. Them”
attitude is shown as the government joins with its citizens for the right to
keep jobs in Canada rather than the traditional capitalist attitude of allowing
the CAT company to move to a place where they are able to make more profit as well as paying their workers less money. The Canadian government is treating
the situation as if Canada and its’ people are the in-group and that CAT must
learn that they cannot just set the example that multi-national companies like
CAT, who employ several hundred workers, can just up and leave whenever they
feel like it especially in such a tough economic time. The article appeals to
Canadian’s from the points of view of authorship because its written by a
Canadian, the format because it explains Canadian laws compared to ones being
enacted in Indiana where the company intends to move, the audience is Canadian
readers and the content that is written is done so to get a reaction out of the
Canadian worker.

http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20120203/caterpillar-closing-electromotive-plant-120203/

agenda setting

Agenda Setting

                Stephen Harper and his majority conservative government are looking to change the laws in Canada and the turn the criminal justice system upside down. The new omnibus crime bill c-10 calls for more jail time and harsh penalties for those individuals caught with possession of drugs. The Harper government is using their newly elected majority government to pass bills they could not get to pass in parliament when they had the majority because all of the other political party’s saw this as a radical change to a criminal justice system that is already overcrowded while the actual crime rate in Canada is going down. The influence of the United States government is clearly affecting the conservative party’s mindset as they look to emulate a “tough on crime” and “war on drugs” approach that failed so miserably for so many years in the United States. The CBC is forced to report both the positive and negative aspects of this issue as they must draw attention to the “safe communities” aspect rather than the alternative forms of media who are outright criticizing this bill and everything it stands for. The costs financial, economical and social are huge but the CBC continues to focus on both aspects and is unable to come out and report badly about the prime minister because of his position of power. If it were up to their reporters to be able to voice their opinions I have no doubt in my mind that the comments and reports would be similar to those which are left in the comments section at the bottom of the website which are all condemning the move.

Tories’ crime bill clears Parliament

By Meagan Fitzpatrick, CBC News

Posted: Mar 12, 2012 12:44 PM ET

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2012 6:43 AM ET

Read 1968 comments1968

The government's omnibus crime bill passed the House of Commons Monday night. The bill's measures are expected to increase the population in Canadian jails and prisons.The government’s omnibus crime bill passed the House of Commons Monday night. The bill’s measures are expected to increase the population in Canadian jails and prisons. (Paul Daly/Canadian Press.)

The Conservative government’s controversial crime bill has passed a final vote in the House of Commons, a few days later than the government expected.

The Tories had planned to pass Bill C-10 last Wednesday, but the NDP was able to delay the last day of debate until Friday and push the final vote to Monday.

<a href=”http://www.coveritlive.com/mobile.php/option=com_mobile/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=03912b8768″>Parliament Hill Ticker</a>

Prior to the final vote, Justice Minister Rob Nicholson said he was disappointed by the opposition tactics.

“These are very reasonable measures. They go after those who sexually exploit children, people in the child pornography business and it goes after drug traffickers, so this will be welcomed particularly by victims, those involved with law enforcement, and as we know, Canadians are supportive of what we are doing in this area,” Nicholson told reporters.

He said once the bill becomes law the government will consult with the provinces to decide on timelines for implementing its various measures.

“We’re going to space a number of them out,” he said.

The bill had been sent back to the Commons by the Senate because of amendments made to the part of the bill that gives Canadians the ability to sue perpetrators and supporters of terrorism.

Three hours of debate

After taking up more than three hours of debate by reiterating his party’s opposition to the omnibus crime bill, NDP MP Jack Harris proposed a motion to reject the Senate amendments. The Conservatives were able to defeat the motion and pass the bill by a vote of 154-129.

Harris said Bill C-10 will not deter criminals and he predicts there will be more crimes and victims because of it.

More people will be put behind bars, and for longer, and will be released without rehabilitation and will be more likely to commit more crimes, said Harris.

“There are a whole series of problems with the bill that can’t get our support,” he said.

Harris said the provinces are going to have to carry most of the costs and that the federal government isn’t co-operating with them on that front.

Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae said passing the bill marks a “step backwards.”

He said the Conservatives are trying to micromanage the Criminal Code and are making unnecessary changes.

“It makes no sense for the government to be going in this direction. It’s not a real crime prevention strategy, it’s a prison promotion strategy, it’s an incarceration strategy, that I think will prove to be a very costly mistake for Canada,” said Rae.

The safe streets and communities act, as the legislation is called, combines bills that were introduced separately in previous sessions of Parliament but never passed. It makes a number of major changes to the justice and corrections systems, and several of the measures have been controversial.

Critics oppose mandatory minimum sentences

The toughening of jail sentences and the introduction of new mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug and other offences are among the measures opposed by critics.

Louise Arbour, former justice at the Supreme Court of Canada, is one of those critics and a member of the Global Commission on Drug Policy, a group that studies and makes recommendations on national drug policies around the world. She told CBC News on Monday that mandatory minimum sentences are generally “bad criminal law policies.”

They preclude judges from considering the specific circumstances of the offender and the offence and tie their hands, Arbour said. With marijuana-related offences, mandatory minimum sentences “go completely against the modern thinking by world leaders about the direction that the so-called war on drugs should take after 40 years of failure,” she said.

The government says it is targeting drug traffickers, but Arbour says mandatory minimum sentences won’t put a dent in what is a global problem. In her opinion, the safe streets and communities act is “a very costly enterprise that is based on ideology rather than science and progressive experimental initiatives that Canada is very famous for,” Arbour said.

The opposition parties have supported the part of C-10 that toughens sentences for child sex offenders and they wanted those proposals separated from the bill, but the government kept C-10 as a complete package.

Nicholson and Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, the other lead minister on the bill, have always defended it by saying it will lead to improved safety for Canadians and better protection for victims and that it will give more appropriate punishments to offenders.